The Limits of Reading:
In one of the final chapters of The Introduction it discusses the limits
of reading, and the evolution of the book—and the lift on the constraints
holding “the book” back from popularity. The
Introduction to Book History traces the economic value of the book, the
rise of industrial printing, and the rise of the novel to describe the change
in perception.
Because of the economic value of books
weren’t designed for every man in the 16th century, literacy wasn’t
wide spread. They would have been the equivalent to 3/8ths of an average
shopkeeper. That same sum would have allowed him to visit the globe theater for
about six performances. In other words, at first books were designed for the
wealthy (111). It wasn’t until the 19th century that when
industrialization of printing and the collective purchasing for commercial and public
libraries allowing access to books.
The popularity of a new genre called the
novel grew out of the 18th century, and is claimed to by Robinson
Crusoe. The Introduction mentions the
development of long burning oil lamps that lead reading to become a solo
activity. Pamela, a novel written by Samul Richardson also lays claim to the
emerging genre of the novel. This book mostly caught the attraction of female
readership because it was a contemporary soap opera with an eponymous heroine
and Sunday sermon moral values.
However, the tricky thing about the genre
the novel, there is a lot of criticism debating and explaining what is, and
what isn’t considered a part of the genre. Eliza Haywood for example was an
anti-pamelist (someone that is skeptical to the moral up that didn’t always
write true novels, but she does have a novella. The difference? It is the
relative difference in length of a novel and a novella (in modern day). I
believe that the Introduction over
simplifies what the rise of the novel has done for the book.
According to Ian Watt, he would say:
Novels are prose, fictional narratives
that are characterized by “formal realism.”
As a result: They focus on actual experience of individuals, and are
individualist, they value the innovative and originality, thereby rejecting
traditional plots. They reject universals, emphasizing particularity of
descriptions, thereby rejecting character types and tag names. They focus on
personal identity in time rather than by values, thereby providing detailed treatments
of time & its passing. They focus on the individual in space, actual
physical environments, thereby rejecting the vagueness of romance. They focus
on actual experiences of individuals using concrete, referential language,
thereby rejecting linguistic ornateness and earlier formal rhetorical styles. The
rise of the novel is associated in a causative way with the rise of literacy
and the rise of the middle class (Marvin Lansverk’s Lecture).
As Ian Watt coins the simplified version
of it (triple rise theory):
In the eighteenth century we get:
- The rise of the novel
- The rise of literacy
- & the rise of the middle class.
And they are all interrelated to help
create the novel. Robinson Crusoe,
Pamula, Joseph Andrews, Fantomina, and countless other novels are responsible
for the rise of the novel as a genre that we see today.
No comments:
Post a Comment